


Charles Samek KC is a highly experienced English barrister and King's Counsel (KC, or Silk). He has been at the Bar since 1989, and has been a KC since 2009. He is recommended in the major legal directories as a leading KC in the following practice areas: (1) commercial dispute resolution; (2) civil fraud; (3) banking and finance; (4) offshore litigation. Charles Samek KC is first and foremost an advocate, whose expertise lies in presenting a client's case to the court, whether at first instance or on appeal, and in cross-examination of factual and expert witnesses at trial.
He has been shortlisted (one of three) by Chambers & Partners for '2025 Commercial Litigation Silk of the Year', and by Legal 500 as ‘2019 Commercial Litigation Silk of the Year'.
Charles Samek KC advises clients with regard to commercial disputes. He appears regularly as an advocate in London's High Court, principally the King's Bench Division (Commercial Court), and he has appeared as an advocate over 25 times in the Court of Appeal.
As a self-employed barrister, Charles Samek KC may accept instructions from solicitors based in England & Wales, and from foreign legal representatives, for advice, drafting and representation in court. He is also able in some cases to accept instructions directly from clients, typically to advise in relation to actual or possible legal proceedings.
Charles Samek KC was educated at St Paul's School, London and Oriel College, Oxford University where he read Classics ("Mods & Greats"). He then took a law conversion course at the City University (now part of the University of London) before commencing pupillage at what is now Littleton Chambers.
He speaks excellent Italian; decent French; and some Russian.
Chambers & Partners and Legal 500 for 2026:
Charles Samek KC is also described by the Lexology Index: Asset Recovery 2026 as a "thought leader" at the Bar.
He has also received judicial compliments for his hard work, submissions and cross-examination from trial judges in two recent high-profile cases:
Charles Samek KC has done many cases involving foreign law. For example: Russian (civil, family and procedural codes), Iranian, Saudi (Hanbali school) (wrongs and damages), Icelandic, Italian, Luxembourg, Vatican, Canon, UAE, US, Lebanese, Ukrainian, New York, Brazilian, Cayman, Jersey & BVI law.
He is called to the Bar of the British Virgin Islands and regularly appears in the BVI Commercial Court, including having acted in trials and before the Eastern Caribbean Court of Appeal (and in what is now the leading case on Section 125 Evidence Act 2006 relating to the admissibility of unlawfully obtained evidence - Capital WWW Investment Limited (in liquidation) v Tall Trade Limited). He has appeared ad hoc in the Cayman Islands and has also acted assisting Isle of Man advocates and Jersey advocates. He also has rights of audience in the Astana International Financial Centre and is currently instructed in financial services litigation there.

With over 36 years experience as a practising barrister, 17 of them as a King's Counsel (formerly Queen's Counsel), Charles Samek KC believes in establishing at the earliest stage possible the client's objectives and then mapping out a strategy to achieve them.

Strategy is nothing without meticulous planning. There are no shortcuts in preparation, whether for the purpose of advice, pleading out a case or preparation for trial. Charles Samek KC will spend whatever time is required to ensure that no-one in the courtroom has a better knowledge of the law and facts than him.

Too many lawyers forget that they serve their client. Charles Samek KC is not one of those. He believes in establishing a close rapport with the client and is happy to have as much engagement with the client as they want and as the case demands.

This is why Charles Samek KC does what he does. Since an early age, he only ever wanted to be an advocate. He would describe himself as a commercial advocate, coming to presentation in court with a commercially-minded approach, and fearless in submissions to the court and, when necessary, merciless in cross-examination.
Charles acted for the successful claimants in the first ever claim brought in the English courts against an emanation of the Vatican state. The case concerned business dealings in relation to the old Harrods depository building in Chelsea, London and resulted in the English Commercial Court granting his clients the vast majority of the relief claimed as well as a substantial costs order in their favour.
He also acted for PPE Medpro Limited in its defence of a £125m claim brought against it by the Secretary of State for Health & Social Care.
Charles appeared in the UK Supreme Court in one of the leading cases on the tort of unlawful means conspiracy, holding that a breach of a court order such as a freezing order, may constitute the requisite unlawful means.
As a junior barrister, he also acted for the successful respondents in the leading appellate case establishing the "Dadourian guidelines" relating to applications to enforce English worldwide freezing orders in foreign courts.
He has considerable experience of obtaining and resisting interim remedies, including interlocutory prohibitory and mandatory injunctions, domestic and worldwide freezing orders, search orders and information orders.
Charles has acted in many cases, including leading cases, concerned with the recognition and enforcement, or registration, of foreign judgments and orders. For example:
Charles has considerably experience of obtaining anti-suit and anti-enforcement injunctions, whether related to ongoing arbitration proceedings or foreign proceedings. Recently he successfully obtained ex parte anti-suit and anti-enforcement injunctions in relation to substantial monetary judgments obtained in the Georgian courts contrary to arbitration agreements between the parties, leading ultimately to a settlement of the Georgian and arbitral proceedings.
Charles has acted in many of the leading cases concerned with the English court taking or refusing jurisdiction for cases having a foreign element. For example:
Charles acted for the successful appellant in the English Court of Appeal which established the principle that a sum awarded under an unregistered and unrecognised foreign judgment may not found a bankruptcy petition. (Note: the case will be heard by the UK Supreme Court on appeal at the end of June 2026.)
Charles has acted in many types of shareholder and company cases including share sale agreement litigation; good/bad leaver disputes; LLP / partnership disputes including regarding exit provisions; unfair prejudice petitions and other minority shareholder litigation.
Charles acted for the successful appellants in the English Court of Appeal in what is now the leading appellate case regarding the imposition of case management stays. The Court of Appeal held that there is a single test for the grant of such a stay - whether in the particular circumstances it is in the interests of justice for a case management stay to be granted.
He also acted for the successful appellant in one of the leading cases as regards the grant of stays of execution.
Charles has appeared on many occasions in the BVI Commercial Court (i.e. before Leon, Wallbank, Jack, Webster and Mithani JJ). He has also appeared before the Eastern Caribbean Court of Appeal twice for successful appellants. The cases include applications to set aside statutory demands; bankruptcy petitions; disputes between shareholders; forum challenges; freezing injunctions including Chabra orders; applications on behalf of an administrator ad colligenda bona; unfair prejudice claims. E.g.:
Littleton Chambers, 3 (North) Kings Bench Walk, London, EC4Y 7HR
Charles Samek KC